Why Does Microsoft Still Stick with ApiControllers?

Sam Jones
3 min readOct 27, 2023

--

Introduction

The evolution of C# and its .NET Core framework has been nothing short of remarkable, establishing itself as a top-tier choice for robust applications and services. Yet, as developers have journeyed alongside its growth, a recurring question emerges: “In an age where REST APIs and Domain-Driven Design (DDD) principles reign supreme, why does Microsoft still advocate for the use of ApiControllers?” This conundrum becomes even more exciting when you consider that the term “controller” often seems inappropriate in this domain-centric world.

MVC and the Role of Controllers

In traditional web development, the Model-View-Controller (MVC) architecture stands out prominently. Controllers within this framework have a well-defined role, bridging the model (data) with the view (UI). This ensures that user input gets transformed into commands, either for the model or the view. When you’re dealing with UI interactions, controllers indeed make sense and are an integral part of the MVC construct.

However, when the focus shifts to DDD, we dive deep into the heart of our software, which is its domain — a meticulous reflection of intricate business logic and complexities. The approach here is about understanding and modeling the ubiquitous language, aggregates, entities, and value objects. It’s a departure from the UI-centric world that controllers typically inhabit.

The Evolution of REST and API Controllers

When transitioning from the UI-focused MVC paradigm to the data-driven REST paradigm, the role of controllers becomes less clear. In the realm of RESTful APIs, the traditional MVC “view” is conspicuously absent. Here, the narrative is about data interchange, not about how the data is presented or visualized. So, using ‘controller’ in this context feels semantically incongruent. What we’re really talking about is managing data requests and responses, a role that doesn’t quite resonate with the established duties of an MVC controller.

So, why does Microsoft continue to promote the use of ApiControllers in an era that seems to demand a different approach?

Legacy Compatibility

One of the most significant reasons for the persistence of ApiControllers is the principle of legacy compatibility. Microsoft has a vast developer community and a vast library of applications and services that rely on the MVC architecture and ApiControllers. Transitioning away from them entirely could disrupt these established systems, causing frustration for developers and businesses alike. While new projects and applications might adopt more modern practices, maintaining support for existing systems is crucial.

Pragmatism and Ease of Use

ApiControllers, despite their nomenclature, have proven to be pragmatic and easy to use in the context of RESTful APIs. They provide a clear structure for handling HTTP requests and responses, making it straightforward for developers to build and maintain APIs. Microsoft recognizes the importance of simplicity and developer-friendliness, which is why they continue to support ApiControllers, as they align with these principles.

Gradual Transition

Microsoft, in its approach, doesn’t force developers into a one-size-fits-all solution. While they promote modern practices like using endpoint routing and minimal APIs, they also acknowledge that the transition from traditional MVC to RESTful APIs can be gradual. Developers can adopt new practices as they see fit, ensuring that the ecosystem remains versatile and adaptable.

Community and Adoption

The .NET community is diverse, and it includes developers from various backgrounds and with different preferences. ApiControllers have seen widespread adoption, and many developers are comfortable with them. Microsoft acknowledges the importance of community input and strives to meet the needs and expectations of a broad user base.

Conclusion

In an age where REST APIs and Domain-Driven Design principles have taken center stage, the use of ApiControllers may seem like a relic of the past. However, Microsoft’s decision to stick with ApiControllers is not merely a matter of tradition; it’s rooted in practicality, legacy support, and a commitment to serving the diverse needs of the developer community.

As the software development landscape continues to evolve, Microsoft will likely adapt its recommendations and offerings to align with the changing paradigms. Until then, ApiControllers remains a relevant and valuable tool for developers building APIs on the .NET platform, offering a bridge between the past and the future of web development.

Reach out if you need exceptional Microsoft services.

--

--

No responses yet